The 75×75 100×100
Friday, January 20, 2006 23:04
Y’know how In N’ Out’s “double-double” is double meat/double cheese? Yeah, well…
UPDATE: As reader/researcher StarCreator corrects, this is actually a 100×100, total cost $97.66, as blogged over a year ago by What Up Willy. Thanks to StarCreator for the find, and I strongly recommend visiting the original slideshow this pic comes from: a group of friends killing a Vegas booze buzz and snapping photos all along the way (registration to KodayEasyShareGallery req’d).
By Why We Type (see more of his posts).
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Jonah says:
January 20th, 2006 at 11:14 pm
Surely there’s a story there, or do we write it ourselves?
“Mr Atkins’s wake started with a light appetizer…”
Maribeth says:
January 21st, 2006 at 9:25 am
Caltech undergraduates have been known to order a 100×100 for a party.
eatdrinknbmerry says:
January 21st, 2006 at 10:42 am
For a minute I thought I&O actually had a box for something as horrid as that. I like how they MacGuyvered it with a foil wrap box.
MaxMillion says:
January 21st, 2006 at 1:38 pm
Mr Atkins’s wake started with a light appetizer… A crusty old dowager, her face resembling a fallen pie, glanced askew at the jumbo sandwich on offer and sneered.
“Gahh!” she spat. “Do you think they might have taken a moment’s consideration for the catering, given the old coot did, in fact, die of a massive coronary?!”
“Mmwhuff?” mumbled her shy, diminutive companion, her mouth crammed with greasy, cheesy delights…
Beopenguin says:
January 22nd, 2006 at 1:11 am
And all this time I thought I was a badass for once finishing a 5×5…
Why We Type says:
January 23rd, 2006 at 11:05 am
In N’ Out’s “secret menu” has become fairly common knowledge since the internet, and local blogger Badmouth has covered it thoroughly with reviews and pictures.
After a lunchtime chat about it the other day, (who said Gingergrass doesn make good pho??) my lunchmate emailed me this snap. I don’t know when or by whom it was taken, but inquiries have been made. I’ll comment back when I find out.
StarCreator says:
January 23rd, 2006 at 3:57 pm
Some research (read: boredom) revealed what might be the original origin of this image, complete with additional images, posted back in November 2004 - http://whatupwilly.blogspot.com/2004/11/vegas-recap.html
Of course, the post claims it’s a 100×100, not a 75×75.
Why We Type says:
January 23rd, 2006 at 4:05 pm
No doubt about it! Thanks Starcreator, glad you’ve got nothing better to do! My own research for a picture ref came up dry, and now I know it’s because I was told this was a 75×75. Will update above.
Will says:
January 23rd, 2006 at 4:26 pm
Wow…i’m pseudo-famous. That’s my blog..and yes we did finish the greasy-disgusting-100×100. It has been over a year..and I haven’t eaten In’N'Out since. I think I personally put down 21 or 22 patties and cheese glop.
We only had one person barf…
MaxMillion says:
January 23rd, 2006 at 4:44 pm
Hey, thanks for badmouth’s link with the great pix — ya know, until today I always thought “protein style” — my all-time fave and absolutely the *only* burger that will pass my lips, on rare occasions — and “animal style” were somehow the same. Cool.
The “flying dutchman” — WTF?!? too funny!
Jeff says:
January 24th, 2006 at 10:29 am
So according to Will’s site, the extrapolated caloric content of the 100×100 was 19490. This means for every meat and cheese combo, it was around 200 calories. So for the party members who ate 20+ patties, that was 4000+!!!!! calories in one sitting. Wow, that would definitely put off anyone from eating In-n-Out for a long time.
eatdrinknbmerry says:
January 24th, 2006 at 12:07 pm
i like how the employee in the back is staring at the camera like there’s nothing abnormal about the current 75 x 75 order.
“Yep, those are big sellers, alright.”
MaxMillion says:
January 25th, 2006 at 4:11 pm
Hey, isn’t anyone else gonna add to the short story Jonah and I started? The story behind the monster-sandwich??
monty says:
February 1st, 2006 at 1:09 am
“and to follow…. a wafer thin mint?”