Comments on: The 75×75 100×100 http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/ foodblogging los angeles Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:23:31 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: nick tennies http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-518786 nick tennies Tue, 16 Mar 2010 23:46:54 +0000 http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-518786 omg all of you are wrong im definately gonna bby a 100 x 100 and eat it myself omg all of you are wrong im definately gonna bby a 100 x 100 and eat it myself

]]> By: In-N-Out Burger » Webomatica - Entertainment and Tech Digest http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-496084 In-N-Out Burger » Webomatica - Entertainment and Tech Digest Sun, 20 Dec 2009 20:20:15 +0000 http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-496084 [...] For example, the term “4×4″ is a burger with four patties and four slices of cheese. Some simple number substitution can lead to a glutton-buster of your worst fantasies. Here’s a picture of a 100×100. [...] [...] For example, the term “4×4″ is a burger with four patties and four slices of cheese. Some simple number substitution can lead to a glutton-buster of your worst fantasies. Here’s a picture of a 100×100. [...]

]]> By: monty http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-5973 monty Wed, 01 Feb 2006 09:09:12 +0000 http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-5973 "and to follow.... a wafer thin mint?" “and to follow…. a wafer thin mint?”

]]> By: MaxMillion http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-5886 MaxMillion Thu, 26 Jan 2006 00:11:21 +0000 http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-5886 Hey, isn't anyone else gonna add to the short story Jonah and I started? The story behind the monster-sandwich?? Hey, isn’t anyone else gonna add to the short story Jonah and I started? The story behind the monster-sandwich??

]]> By: eatdrinknbmerry http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-5863 eatdrinknbmerry Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:07:26 +0000 http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-5863 i like how the employee in the back is staring at the camera like there's nothing abnormal about the current 75 x 75 order. "Yep, those are big sellers, alright." i like how the employee in the back is staring at the camera like there’s nothing abnormal about the current 75 x 75 order.

“Yep, those are big sellers, alright.”

]]> By: Jeff http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-5862 Jeff Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:29:30 +0000 http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-5862 So according to Will's site, the extrapolated caloric content of the 100x100 was 19490. This means for every meat and cheese combo, it was around 200 calories. So for the party members who ate 20+ patties, that was 4000+!!!!! calories in one sitting. Wow, that would definitely put off anyone from eating In-n-Out for a long time. So according to Will’s site, the extrapolated caloric content of the 100×100 was 19490. This means for every meat and cheese combo, it was around 200 calories. So for the party members who ate 20+ patties, that was 4000+!!!!! calories in one sitting. Wow, that would definitely put off anyone from eating In-n-Out for a long time.

]]> By: MaxMillion http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-5858 MaxMillion Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:44:20 +0000 http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-5858 Hey, thanks for badmouth's link with the great pix -- ya know, until today I always thought "protein style" -- my all-time fave and absolutely the *only* burger that will pass my lips, on rare occasions -- and "animal style" were somehow the same. Cool. The "flying dutchman" -- WTF?!? too funny! Hey, thanks for badmouth’s link with the great pix — ya know, until today I always thought “protein style” — my all-time fave and absolutely the *only* burger that will pass my lips, on rare occasions — and “animal style” were somehow the same. Cool.

The “flying dutchman” — WTF?!? too funny!

]]> By: Will http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-5857 Will Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:26:31 +0000 http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-5857 Wow...i'm pseudo-famous. That's my blog..and yes we did finish the greasy-disgusting-100x100. It has been over a year..and I haven't eaten In'N'Out since. I think I personally put down 21 or 22 patties and cheese glop. We only had one person barf... Wow…i’m pseudo-famous. That’s my blog..and yes we did finish the greasy-disgusting-100×100. It has been over a year..and I haven’t eaten In’N'Out since. I think I personally put down 21 or 22 patties and cheese glop.

We only had one person barf…

]]> By: Why We Type http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-5856 Why We Type Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:05:20 +0000 http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-5856 No doubt about it! Thanks Starcreator, glad you've got nothing better to do! My own research for a picture ref came up dry, and now I know it's because I was told this was a 75x75. Will update above. No doubt about it! Thanks Starcreator, glad you’ve got nothing better to do! My own research for a picture ref came up dry, and now I know it’s because I was told this was a 75×75. Will update above.

]]> By: StarCreator http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-5855 StarCreator Mon, 23 Jan 2006 23:57:43 +0000 http://la.foodblogging.com/2006/01/20/the-75x75/#comment-5855 Some research (read: boredom) revealed what might be the original origin of this image, complete with additional images, posted back in November 2004 - http://whatupwilly.blogspot.com/2004/11/vegas-recap.html Of course, the post claims it's a 100x100, not a 75x75. Some research (read: boredom) revealed what might be the original origin of this image, complete with additional images, posted back in November 2004 - http://whatupwilly.blogspot.com/2004/11/vegas-recap.html

Of course, the post claims it’s a 100×100, not a 75×75.

]]>